The Definitive Guide to advantages of case law uk

nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair towards the offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

It is also important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual size of service almost violates your complete service composition being a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention on the regulation nor in the equity. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.

This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't convince the department of his/her innocence.

If you find an error during the information of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or perhaps a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case regulation within a particular court. Indeed, each circuit has its have set of binding case regulation. Therefore, a judgment rendered inside the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this form of law strives to form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help website of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a properly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.